Before you commit to the sprint, find out how the whole team actually feels. Everyone votes anonymously on a 1-5 scale. Votes are hidden until the host reveals - no anchoring, no pressure.
Start a free roomNo account required. Anonymous by design. Password-protected rooms supported.
A sprint confidence vote is a quick anonymous pulse check during sprint planning. Before the team commits to the sprint goal, every member independently rates how confident they are that the team can deliver it - typically on a 1-5 scale from “not confident at all” to “all in.”
The anonymous format is what makes it work. When votes are hidden until revealed, junior developers are just as likely to flag concerns as senior ones. Nobody anchors to the Scrum Master's optimism or the product owner's enthusiasm. You get an honest read of the room before it is too late to act on it.
A low confidence score is a signal. Someone knows something the rest of the room does not. The optional reasoning field tells you exactly what.
People say things anonymously they would not say out loud. That is the point. You want the real answer, not the politically safe one.
A confidence vote takes less time than a round of "does anyone have concerns?" - and gives you far more signal.
A low average before the sprint starts is a gift. It is far cheaper to re-scope now than to explain a missed commitment at the sprint review.
Common moments in the sprint cycle where a confidence vote pays off.
The sprint backlog is set and the goal is written. Before everyone closes their laptops, run a quick confidence vote. If the average is below 3, that is your cue to re-examine scope before the sprint starts.
Three days in, something changed. A dependency slipped, a ticket turned out to be larger than estimated. A confidence re-vote tells you if the team still believes in the goal or if a scope conversation is overdue.
The product owner just added a "small but urgent" story mid-sprint. How does the team actually feel about it? Find out before you commit.
Capacity just dropped. The goal may no longer be realistic. A quick vote surfaces whether the team thinks it can still deliver or whether expectations need resetting with stakeholders.
When a team is still calibrating their velocity, confidence votes help identify where estimates might be optimistic. A pattern of low confidence in early sprints is a sign to invest in better estimation practices.
Host creates a room and shares the link or room code with the team.
Everyone joins with a randomly assigned anonymous name like "Blue Fox" or "Red Tiger" - no real names, no identity.
Each person selects their confidence level: 1 (not confident) through 5 (all in), with an optional reason.
Votes are hidden from everyone until the host reveals them - preventing anchoring and social pressure.
Host reveals all votes at once. The average score and full breakdown appear immediately.
The optional reasoning text turns the vote into a conversation starter - you know not just that someone scored low, but why.
Host can reset for a new round. Everyone gets a fresh anonymous name, keeping each round independent.
Create a free room in seconds. No account, no setup. Just share the link and vote.
Start a free Sprint Confidence room